Nikola Daubnerova vs Karolina Vlckova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Daubnerova excels on second serve points recently, winning 46.15%, compared to Vlckova's lower rate of 32.07%. Can Vlckova improve here?
• When it comes to returning second serves, Vlckova shows a stronger form with a win rate of 59.48%, while Daubnerova manages 51.32%.
• Both players are relatively close in first serve return rates; Daubnerova is slightly higher at 37.25% against Vlckova's 34.32%.
• Under pressure, Vlckova marginally outperforms Daubnerova in saving breakpoints, with a rate of 46.38% compared to Daubnerova’s 46.15%.
• Vlckova has a significant advantage with a win percentage of 64.81% over the past year, whereas Daubnerova stands at 50%.
• Considering surface preferences, Daubnerova performs best on Indoor hard courts, winning 45%, while Vlckova prefers clay with a win rate of 52%.
• In similar tournaments, Vlckova surpasses Daubnerova with a win rate of 67.39% versus 53.85% at the $10K level events.
• Daubnerova faces tougher competition, playing opponents ranked on average at 194.64, whereas Vlckova's opponents have a lower average rank of 402.26. Will this experience against higher-ranked opponents aid Daubnerova?
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Vlckova holds an edge with a 69% win rate compared to Daubnerova's 29% success rate.
• Vlckova shows better breakpoint conversion at 42.57%, surpassing Daubnerova's 29.17%.

Editorial Prediction (July 14, 2025, UTC):

Examining their recent statistics reveals contrasting strengths for Daubnerova and Vlckova. Daubnerova demonstrates a notable proficiency in winning second serve points, while Vlckova's forte lies in returning serves, particularly second serves, where she excels significantly.

The pressure situation performance sees a stark contrast; both players have similar success in break point saves, but Vlckova leads in break point conversions. This suggests a critical edge in capitalizing on crucial moments during matches.

The win-loss records solidly favor Vlckova, indicating her consistent ability to close out games. Furthermore, her superior rate of victory in deciding sets suggests she is more robust in high-pressure concluding moments.

Vlckova's record of playing lower-ranked opponents might pose questions about the consistency of competition faced. However, her higher overall win percentage and effective breakpoint conversion rate give her a competitive advantage.

In summary, although Daubnerova brings certain strengths into the matchup, the overall statistical analysis supports Vlckova as the likely victor in this upcoming encounter, given her superior win rate and decisive set performance capabilities.